Talk:Subjectile

Philosophy: Language / Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of language
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Linguistics: Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

comment

My doctoral thesis, nearing completion, is titled 'Material thinking in Art: subject, object and the subjectile'. My research developes the ideas proposed by Artaud's subjectile and Derrida's discussion of it. The case studies on artists from the canon focus on how the material properties of art objects inform the relationship between subject and object. I would like to develope the Wikipedia page further, but do not wish to delete the prior entry as edited by PBR0000 on 7 April 2010. However this entry contains inaccuracies and some statements are not corroborated by citations and/or sources. I would be happy to share ideas for improving the page. I will in due course add more material to the entry and make proposals for further editing and improvements. It would be helpful if other editors could do the same. Timlong1 (talk) 08:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)timlong1 Tim Long's website[reply]

I have improved the page and deleted an earlier entry that did not contain many verifications. I hope the additional sources and cross-references substantiate the entry. Tim Long Tim Long's website

At some point, the article actually has to tell the reader what a "subjectile" is. Otherwise this will be deleted for sure. Greg Bard (talk) 05:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]