Talk:Sugar crash

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Sugar crash.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Who paid to have this page so biased and pathetic. Sugar crash is specifically related to consuming more than the healthy amount of quickly metabolized refined carbohydrates such as processed foods, flour, sugar, sauces, jellies, sucroses, sweet toppings, dipping sauces - but it is also the accomodating crash when provoked by overeating of any food, refined and nasty or not.

If you want proof about the sugar crash, I will not point you to any documentation. We and all of the industrialized nations, bu particularly america has the highest obesity rate in the world, and profiteers market foods which provoke this reaction, which can only be staved off by continually feeding the upside of the cycle - ie, eating more crap. Delete this at your moral peril. Lives are lost because of the shortage of this information. So yes, I am saying the deletion without a dork-approved citation is akin to accessory to manslaughter, profiteering, and crimes against humanity, especially american children. Stuff that in your syrup can and pour it!

Hi. Wikipedia's editing policy disapproves of original research; you must provide citations from external references. Be bold and modify the article if you feel it's inaccurate, but please note that comments such as yours in this talk page won't be acceptable in the main article. 201.216.245.25 (talk) 22:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page claims that the "sugar crash" has never been scientifically confirmed. Is that supposed to be a joke? Everybody knows that eating large quatities of sucrose, i.e. candy, leads to a form of hangover. And it's the reason most adults don't eat large amounts of deseart. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.151.22 (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever wrote the "PLZ UPDATE" thing is just plain rude. The article is fine thanyouverymuch. go outside you low-life, idiotic, not-going-anywhere-in-life, no good troll!

Duplicated page

As it say in the opening line, Sugar crash is also known as reactive hypoglycemia, so why is there a page for both? Obscurasky (talk) 17:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Obscurasky: given your stated interest, see the merger proposal at reactive hypoglycemia. μηδείς (talk) 07:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should include coverage of the sugar rush myth

There is a common belief that sugar contributes to hyperactivity, interferes with sleep, or stimulates a "sugar rush". This is a myth. Sugar has mildly sedative properties. It acts similarly to other simple carbohydrates in normal individuals. Since this myth is widespread, and is commonly linked with the idea of the rush being followed by a sugar crash, it would be worth covering both here, and pointing out that sugar crash is abnormal. Parents won’t believe me, but ‘sugar rush’ is a myth A high sugar content, low caffeine drink does not alleviate sleepiness but may worsen it. 70.199.163.97 (talk) 06:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You should add this it is interesting.★Trekker (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]