Talk:Suicide of Rebecca Sedwick

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 November 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

This page was nominated for deletion on 5 August 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Untitled

This is a draft but if there are any issues please feel free and edit the page to make it better

Page Title

Should this page be called Rebecca Ann Sedwick rather than Suicide of Rebecca Ann Sedwick??? GrimRob (talk) 22:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo: reliability?

The photo (allegedly) of the article subject, File:Rebecca Sedwick 01.jpg, was transferred from Find a Grave and used here under WP:NFCC. Find a Grave is listed in WP:RS/P as unreliable as a reference, and consists of user-generated content. If this content is unreliable with no editorial oversight, then who on Wikipedia has verified that the photo is indeed a depiction of Sedwick? Should we really be in the habit of lifting content from an unreliable source? Elizium23 (talk) 04:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The same photo is used here in a New York Times article, so I think it's pretty reasonable to assume it's a depiction of Sedwick. Proper licensing is a separate question. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, you raise an important point about licensing. A user-generated site is susceptible to license-washing, where a file's original copyright and license status may be obscured by the party who copies and re-uploads it. Would it not be wiser for uploaders here to use reputable sources such as the NYT link you cite, and thereby reduce the risk of infringement? Then again, the way journalism is these days, NYT may have cribbed the photo from Facebook or FindAGrave in the first place... Elizium23 (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Surname

@Python Drink: the guideline is WP:SURNAME and so thank you for the updates. Elizium23 (talk) 21:21, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23, oh thank you so much for pointing me to a guideline! — Python Drink (talk) 21:27, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]