Talk:Supernumerary body part

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

A fact from Supernumerary body part appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that supernumerary body parts can include fingers, toes, and ribs, or in some rare cases, additional sex organs or heads?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/July.

Wikipedia

Is it really correct to call this a "disorder"? I know in some cases it may be so, but in others it would be either neutral or even beneficial (e.g. having six fingers on each hand would make me a better pianist). Cheers — SteveRwanda 08:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most people with a supernumerary body part are treated at an early age, polydactyly included. Some people do make the most of it, as per your example, and in those cases I agree that it would not be seen by them as a disorder, but medically it still is. violet/riga (t) 09:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for replying. I think the situation I mentioned occurred in the film Gattaca actually, but the pianist had to keep his six fingers a massive secret as all genetic misfits were automatically locked up. — SteveRwanda 09:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I remember that now. Looking at List of polydactyl people, one person that claims an advantage is Eric Bristow, who says it helps with his balance. violet/riga (t) 10:02, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Genghis Kahn

The article on Genghis Kahn mentions nothing about extra parts. Scoutersig 21:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed not. violet/riga (t) 21:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zoology vs. Botany

Someone just added a picture of a double tomato to the page. I assume supernumerary body part applies only to members of the animal kingdom (including humans), and that there would be another term for a similar syndrome amongst plants, etc. Could anyone confirm or deny this? samwaltz 08:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that picture came as something as a surprise to me! The body plan article refers to botanical lifeforms too, so perhaps "supernumerary body part" could be used for plants as well as animals, but I really don't know at this moment. I'll have a look into it. violet/riga (t) 15:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page title

Shouldn't this be called "Supernumerary body part" (only capitalising the first word)?