Talk:Supreme Court of South Australia

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Law Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Supreme Court of South Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Coat of Arms??

I think the coat of arms is wrong. Why does it have the UK's cost of arms? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2403:7900:ADE1:A1DE:250:56FF:FEA6:3B1F (talk) 04:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC) No the Coat of Arms is Correct - see also the Supreme Court Act for the insignia on its seal Suastiastu (talk) 12:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boothby

Boothby is well worthy of comment, but I think its incorrect to say he didn't believe in the power of local legislature to enact laws. He was a reasoned lawyer, and mostly he reasoned and held that the laws of the local legislature in question were repugnant to imperial laws which held sway by paramount force. His reasoning led to the Colonial Laws Validity Act - which provided that local legislatures could, going forward, enact laws in their own province which were repugnant to the imperial laws. At least there needs to be a citation for the present assertion if it is to remain. Suastiastu (talk) 12:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]