This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShropshireWikipedia:WikiProject ShropshireTemplate:WikiProject ShropshireShropshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This is being inserted, a web search didn't verify the uncited addition - there are lots of , she is the favorite to be reliable sources but nothing to claim she is the new leader or the acting leader , such as has been adding to the article without any WP:RS to support the claim and so I have removed the claims Govindaharihari (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Evans' full date of birth is not protected private information for the purpose of Wikipedia, thus admissible; however, unsourced full date of birth, or a date of birth of which its evidence is a direct reliance on the record of births and birth certificates from the functions of General Registry Office executed and realised by Her Majesty's Passport Office, within the Home Office, is not permissible by the currently generally-agreed rules of Wikipedia and published accordingly, as an abuse and a misuse of primary sources (WP:BLPPRIMARY); nor is the result of a cursory search made with Google considered an admissible reliable source for Wikipedia; nor are sources, post-dating the insertion of such a full date of birth before its subsequent removal from view (as inadmissible circular source); however, sources, ideally printed or also printed, which primarily or mainly deal with British politics or British political biographies, would not only be generally acceptable but also highly desirable.
Records from Companies House of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, however, do not serve to certify dates of birth of directors or shareholders with any accuracy, authority or warranty, nor does Companies House claim or state that they certify dates of birth, with or without accuracy, authority or warranty (or indeed they actually have any authority for them to do so, were they to elect to do so): they only serve to state the claimed dates of birth, which are (and must be presumed to be) unverified information submitted and accepted "as it is", or, as it was when it was given in submission; thus unpublished (or even published) released British corporate records submitted are inadmissible also as unreliable as proof of the date of birth of a living person. -- Urquhartnite (talk) 05:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
