Talk:TRANSFAC

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TRANSFAC article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Molecular Biology: COMPBIO

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 00:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TRANSFAC → Transfac – Per MOS:TMRULES: Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official". --Relisted. Dekimasuよ! 20:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Ground Zero | t 22:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator. Ground Zero | t 22:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The guideline goes on to say "as long as this is a style already in widespread use, rather than inventing a new one". As far as I can tell, there is not a single reliable source using the suggested title. The examples given in the guideline, (Time, Kiss, Asus, Realtor) differ in that regard. There has to be an element of common sense in applying the manual style, which notes that there are obvious common sense exceptions. --Yaksar (let's chat) 01:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, books and scholar use TRANSFAC Gregkaye ✍♪ 09:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.