Talk:Tam Dalyell of the Binns

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Military history: Biography / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Birthdate discrepancy

Two different birthdates are given in this article; 1599 and 1615; which is correct?--FeanorStar7 (talk) 10:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently that has been fixed.Poihths (talk) 19:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name spelling

The article as I come upon it spells the man's name two different ways. That seems silly to me. We give the variant spellings at the top of the article. That should suffice. The rest of the article should use one standard spelling. I've standardized on the spelling used in the title. Poihths (talk) 19:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title of article

I am not sure that this title is the best way of disambiguating him from his current descendant, since he is actually "of the Binns" as well. "General Tam Dalyell" might be better. PatGallacher (talk) 19:22, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The General was the first T.D.o.t.B. of note though. I think the incumbent Laird of the Binns is more readily recognisable as plain "Tam Dalyell". I may be wrong, but territorial designations do not seem to be much in use, in the common parlance of the present, and certainly the past 'father of the house' does not use such. Brendandh (talk) 09:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]