Talk:Tatuidris

Tatuidris has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 15, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Tatuidris appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Tatuidris tatusia (pictured) is the only ant species with an antenna socket apparatus sitting upside-down?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tatuidris.

Wikipedia

Overseas France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Overseas France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Overseas France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Overseas FranceWikipedia:WikiProject Overseas FranceTemplate:WikiProject Overseas FranceOverseas France articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Insects: Ants Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Ant task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Attribution[edit]

This Wikipedia article is based on Donoso, D.A. (2012), "Additions to the taxonomy of the armadillo ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Tatuidris)", Zootaxa, 3503: 61–81 (PDF). Donoso's article, published in Zootaxa by Magnolia Press, is an open access article (see this link) and free to use, "All open access papers are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License." ([1]). Some content in this Wikipedia article (added in this edit) is based on Creative Commons content from AntWeb ("AntWeb content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License." (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License). jonkerz ♠talk 15:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tatuidris/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 11:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get to support the subfamily article before it was promoted, so let's try again here... FunkMonk (talk) 11:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this on. Burklemore1 (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd merge the single sentence etymology into the taxonomy section. Single sentence sections are discouraged.

Merged. Burklemore1 (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Tatuidris, or armadillo ants, is a rare genus of ants" Shouldn't armadilo ant be singular here?

Changed. jonkerz ♠talk 17:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Analysis of DNA barcodes indicated a pattern of genetic isolation by distance" For how long?

Upon reading the source, it isn't very clear as to how long, though I may have not read it clearly. Burklemore1 (talk) 17:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Recently, Keller (2011) challenged the phylogenetic relationships of the poneromorph subfamilies (including Tatuidris)" So what is his scheme?

Removed sentence, it doesn't really belong here. jonkerz ♠talk 00:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When did it diverge from other ants if it is so ancient?

I've removed "one of the earliest lineages" and "very isolated" claims from the article -- the genus is nested within the poneroids, and Leptanillinae and Martialinae both branched off earlier (it has also had a sister genus since 2014). jonkerz ♠talk 00:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Winkler extraction" Could be explained.

I've created Winkler extraction (formerly a redlink) as a redirect to Glossary of ant terms#Winkler extraction. Let me know if you'd like to see Winkler and/or Berlese extraction explained further. jonkerz ♠talk 18:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are many uncommon terms under description that could be briefly explained.

I'll do this one. Burklemore1 (talk) 06:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems Jonkerz got this before I did, so this appears to be addressed.

"Until recently, no observations of live specimens were registered." Date? "Recently" will mean nothing in, say, 20 years.

Date added. jonkerz ♠talk 18:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colour could be mentioned in the intro.

Added. jonkerz ♠talk 00:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"the systematic status of the tribe has been the focus of intense debate." "Intense" is too hyperbolic.

Removed word. jonkerz ♠talk 17:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That should be it, passed! FunkMonk (talk) 12:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! jonkerz ♠talk 16:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions