Talk:The 1 Second Film

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Animation: American / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Documentary / American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Kiefer's Ear

It would appear they photoshopped the cigarette out of Kiefer's ear! Is this at all notable? Maybe trivia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.5.233.114 (talk) 04:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They also "photoshopped" out Samuel L. Jackson's name and his daughter's face. Where Jackson's name should have been, Keifer's name is instead. Hell, Christina Ricci isn't even shown on the poster and her name is in big bold letters at the top. I'll let you draw your own conclusions about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.23.217 (talk) 02:22, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

When will the ability to purchase a credit end? -Litefantastic 18:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

imdb has removed the credits

I don't know their reasoning, but all of the credits have been removed. That needs to be addressed in this article. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No they haven't. You just have to click on "full cast and crew". -- Kicking222 00:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that odd? They weren't there earlier today, but now they are. User:Zoe|^(talk) 02:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The list of producers have been removed from imdb. They have been replaced by a "Producers of the 1 Second Film" credit, which reads "This name represents the producers of The 1 Second Film (2008) since the list is too large and time consuming to represent fully here, sorry. Please visit the official site for the complete updated list.".--SeizureDog 16:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where one could find an official reference for this, but there was a LOT of controversy (including threats of lawsuits) when IMDB removed individual credits for this movie. This is because the people running the project had used the ability to add your profile to imdb.com as a selling point to get people to become a "producer" for the film. To be specific, imdb.com doesn't allow one to have an entry unless one has verifiable professional credits to one's name. So they were appealing to thousands of wanna-be directors, actors, etc... to give money to the project with the incentive that they could add their name to imdb.com after donating. Then when imdb.com took this away, thousands of people demanded their money back because they no longer had what they were promised. TheGoonSquad (talk) 01:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WOW, according to the 1secondblog, the actual ENTRY for the film is now gone from IMDB. And I searched for it, even based on the director's name -- nowhere to be found. WTF!? 199.214.26.226 (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm that the movie is not listed on IMDB as of 2015, Mullick has only these three films listed: Caine's Arcade (2012); The Three of Us (2003) ;The Box Man (2002). — Brianhe (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

65mm film???

The second paragraph says that it is filmed in 65mm, the final paragraph says it is shown in 70mm as does the official website... I dont understand filming well, but I assume this is a mistake?

It's the same thing, more or less. See 70 mm film. --Metropolitan90 19:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kiefer Sutherland's check

Take a closer look at his check, note the routing numbers are 24 24 24..., certainly a reference to his role as Jack Bauer on the television program "24." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.49.22.45 (talk) 21:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imitators?

I seem to remember hearing about other film projects which imitated this film's fundraising process (of soliciting small donations from lots of people). Does anyone know the names of those other films and if any of them ever got completed? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

why would anyone want to delete this?

is there any reason? see all the celebs? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.180.45.71 (talk) 22:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nirvan Mullick

I think that Nirvan Mullick should have his own page and not a redirect to The 1 Second Film - User:Brianbowie 28/10/09 —Preceding undated comment added 10:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Full list of producers?

This article leans toward a complaint that imdb removed a full list of producers. Why doesn't wikipedia have a full list of producers? I think it's worthy of being here. Heck, I'll do it if no one removes it afterward. Farglesword (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why is this listed on nearly every celeb's page? Seems like an unnotable distinction... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.145.240.99 (talk) 19:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Progress?

Anyone have any idea what happened to this project? It's been 11 years. 75.72.193.194 (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at their website, and it claims to be still in development, which is pretty baffling. How long can it possibly take to make a one-second long film? Robofish (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What are they spending the money on ? How much would an hour-long making of documentary cost ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]