Talk:The Apex Companies

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Needs Work

I don't know where to start on the problems with this article. The peacock terms is just one thing. Smacks of blatant advertising. Qaddosh (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suspect Editing

User 207.190.220.34, which has been performing a large amount of edits on this page, is from the IP block assigned to "apexstores.com" - It is unknown if this user can provide a non-biased entry, therefore this entry should be suspect.

Lookup Results: Apex CTC-APEX (NET-207-190-220-32-1) 207.190.220.32 - 207.190.220.47

BlargBlarg (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But what to do?

I agree that the user seems to have a bias and the article reads more as an advertisement than an encyclopedic entry. How can this article be helped? Granted I might have a sentimental bias myself having grown up in a nearby town... and have visited the establishment in reference. So while I think the entry is wrongly phrased and worded... I feel that the concept of the entry (that there should be one, that is) is valid.

How do we begin? Tildewoody (talk) 14:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apex Stores. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080212013802/http://www.apexmall.com:80/ to http://www.apexmall.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]