Talk:The Brown Hornet
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Anyone has a link for his merchandise?
Fair use rationale for Image:Hornetlogo.gif
Image:Hornetlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This article contains a section 'Feature Theatrical Film" which reads in its entirety:
- "The Fictional Film The Brown Hornet: The Great Galaxy World Adventure Movie was featured in Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids: The Movie
Aside from capitalization and title formatting errors (and the lack of a closing period), I am baffled by this. The article Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids makes no mention of anything that could be the latter production, unless it's Fat Albert (film), the synopsis of which doesn't make it seem a likely occurrence there. Is FA&tCK:TM a (direct to vid?) production left out of that article, or is it that live-action film? Or is the passage totally erroneous? While awaiting help, I'll fix the strictly mechanical errors there anyway. --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)