Talk:The Forest School, Horsham

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assess

Look at the ref tag. Look at other school articles. Victuallers 20:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ive just started this article and its my first wikiproject to be expanded!!Benon 02:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

This article is a collection of indiscriminate and redundnant information and need cleaning up :: Princess Tiswas 19:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

User:MirrorrorriM is adding a 'controversy' section which is an uncited collection of not-particularly-notable information. I have reminded her on her talk page about citing sources, but she has not produced any verifiable sources. At this point, I am treating this section as vandalism, but if you'd like to add sources and explain why this information is notable in an encyclopedia entry on the school, this is the place to do it. -FisherQueen 22:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh My god. look at the state of the names! pisaman2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pisaman2 (talk • contribs)

Cleaning house

I've removed two sections- the school day schedule and the school year calendar. These sections are the biggest repositories of indiscriminate information that Princess Tiswas mentioned above; they are not likely to be interesting or useful for anyone except current students, who presumably already know them. I've left the lengthy staff list for now, but seriously considered cutting it in the interests of eliminating infodumping, too- would be glad to hear any arguments on either side.

Minor changes

A few spelling errors corrected. eg

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pisaman2 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

--RedTreddersCompainion 17:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Murray Time!

We just gotta find it guys!

Fair use rationale for Image:Forest logo.png

Image:Forest logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup To Do

Article is messy. Needs copyediting.
Wikify all sections
Sourcing required.
Fair use images if possible.

--Lendorien (talk) 14:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose to replace entire article

Given that this article seems to be largely unencyclopaedic, and has been tagged for some time, I have set about trying to bring it into line with WP:WPSCH/AG both in terms of headings, and by adding referencing for all facts. The result is in my userspace: User:Tafkam/Forest. I cannot see much else that warrants saving from the old article, but equally I recognise that this would leave little more than a stub. If anyone is able to provide additional detail, then I'd be glad to see it included, but unless there are objections I intend to replace the current article with the content at my userspace in the coming days. Tafkam (talk) 18:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As there has been no objection, I will replace the text now. Tafkam (talk) 18:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Far better than the previous version. Thank you! --Lendorien (talk) 17:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New school logo/Rebrand

The Forest school has been rebranded, see[1] (new school website) All the infomation I know:

Rebranding by "Cleverbox" [2]
Rebranded when 2011/12 term started,around September
New head boy (Hugh Turnbull, see [3]

Any help? I wouldnt dare edit it for the fact it would proberly be changed. Also, my spelling is atrocious. P.s You can call 01403 261 086 to check any details, i is the school's main phone number. 90.199.234.165 (talk) 10:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC) (c/o Daylon124)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Forest School, Horsham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081026122419/http://www.felceandguy.co.uk:80/general/news/ to http://www.felceandguy.co.uk/general/news/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Forest School, Horsham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]