Talk:The Fruit & Veggie Prescription Program

Proposed Deletion

This appears to me to be nothing more than advertising. This is supported by the fact that the originator's username links them to a marketing agency (http://pathinteractive.com/). None of the numerous citations actually link to independent sources that explicitely mention this product. --Korruski (talk) 15:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

This is not an article advertising anything. It is an informational page about a program run by a 501©3nonprofit located in the United States. All of the citations link to independent sources (ex The NYTimes, CNN, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, WNPR etc) except for a which link to the website of the nonprofit running this nutrition program. The Wikipedia page here was not meant to advertise anything, only to inform the public about a nutrition program that is all over the news right now because Veggie Rx a new “term” being introduced into the national conversation about underserved communities. As for the creator, the link does go to a full-service agency - who does (among other things like marketing and advertising) web design and development and happens to handle webmaster duties for this particular nonprofit and was asked to help them code this particular entry. We’ve made a few edits to the page and put in additional references which we hope will help address your original concerns. They are explained in the edit summary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PathInteractive (talk • contribs) 20:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

I've moved your comment under mine, hope that's ok. I see you've removed my prod, which is fair enough. The next step is to list this for AfD, but I think I'll hold off on that while I do a bit more research. Personally, I still think this is not notable, and the few reliable third party sources that do mention the program only do so in passing, but I'm prepared to have a dig around and see if this can be improved. One change that might be good would be to rationalise the citations, as there appear to be a lot of duplicates. --Korruski (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Re Korruski, per your concerns we’ve added more citations. This makes a total of 10 independent sources including the New York Times, CNN, WPNR, The Washington Post and the Boston Globe that all found this topic noteworthy. FYI these sources do not just mention the topic in passing, all of these articles are specifically about the Fruit & Veggie Prescription Program.

Blacklisted Links Found on The Fruit & Veggie Prescription Program

Cyberbot II has detected links on The Fruit & Veggie Prescription Program which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://uspoverty.change.org/blog/view/an_apple_a_day_courtesy_of_your_md

  Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Fruit & Veggie Prescription Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120123144210/http://www.boston.com:80/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/08/13/farmers_market_coupons_used_to_push_healthy_eating/ to http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/08/13/farmers_market_coupons_used_to_push_healthy_eating/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)