Talk:The Killing Fields (film)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	War films task force

Film: British / French / Southeast Asian / War / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Cambodia Low‑importance

The Killing Fields (film) is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

References to use

Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.

Weaver, John; Kreitzer, Larry (2005). "The Killing Fields: The Extreme Limits of Friendship". In Fiddes, Paul; Clarke, Anthony (eds.). Flickering Images: Theology and Film in Dialogue. Regent's Study Guides. Smyth & Helwys Publishing. ISBN 1573124583.

Plot summary

Deftdrummer: Nobody wants to do a plot summary on this sad movie huh? Understandable. Somebody did it and well done!--Danaide (talk) 14:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Killing Fields film.jpg

Image:The Killing Fields film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fhdoidfjncpsieind;soencugjocundoydf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.241.80 (talk) 12:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some questions?!

Yesterday I have had the first chance to see this film in german tv. The page is o.k.but there are some open questions,

dealing with shifting narrativ points of view. In our days there is a difference in style, telling political storys more documentary . - and in Killing fields appear somehow symbolic or double meaning story parts. Fading photos aren't a technical problem, like it is told on the first meaning. Floating time may be the second interpretative meaning and a philosophical dimenson opens.After his flight pran seems to rest and dream on a killing ground. Suddenly he is the leaders servant, in fiction, real. No bridge between these two events visible. Something cut off? Or should the fabulating reciepent work? Disguising himself as a kambodschan bubu his identy vanishes. On the first level and on the other hand he flies again, rescuing a child, which dies at an uncomprehensable point in the dschungel. He himself transforming by flying, in this child means buddhist stuff. The me line loops from episode to episode and the foreign friend is far away. Whose perspective is in?

There are many archimedic decisive points,where more than the action is told.

_and by doing so the real action looses weight ! Strange! Real/ deep and t(h)anks!--Danaide (talk) 14:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Distortion of history

"According to John Pilger, scenes which show the communist Vietnam People's Army liberating Cambodia from the Khmer Rouge and distributing food aid were cut from the film." - This is really pitiful. We should give credit where credit is due, and admit that it was Vietnam that stopped the madness and rescued these people, while the United States did not help. As long as the film omits this fact, it is not an accurate account of the events. Selerian (talk) 15:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

mmmh, as I see it the Vietnamese invaded Cambodia for their own designs. Not to give food aid or "end the madness", which they had to some extend in their own country as well. Now imagine the outcry, if the US invaded Cambodia. The lefties and liberals would have whined that "imperialist" America just "suppressed" a misunderstood Marxist visionary and liberator of the people. Btw. did they mention in the film that Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge were Marxists and radical egalitarians? --2003:5B:E547:1577:6CC4:B570:B912:387A (talk) 12:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: Vietnam War films?

Is this a Vietnam War film? The first line in the Plot section reads,

"The film opens in the Cambodian capital, Phnom Penh, May 1973. The Cambodian national army is fighting a civil war with the communist Khmer Rouge, a result of the Vietnam War overspilling that country’s borders."

So yes, I believe this film should be in the Vietnam War films category. ---Canstusdis (talk) 02:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Land mines

"Pran’s companion steps on a hidden land mine while holding the child. Though Pran pleads with the man to give him the child, the mine goes off, killing them both."

Meaning the film shows a man stepping on a mine, standing there for a while with his foot on it, then lifting his foot at which point it goes off? That's not how mines work - they go off when you step on them. I think I'll write a note to the director. PiCo (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No they don't,they explode when you release the pressure off the trigger in a reverse firing system. I had to make safe many land mines of various origins and everyone would trigger if stepped on, but exploded when the pressure released. So the scene in the film is accurate.90.244.51.17 (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Killing Fields (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090413003614/http://www.channel4.com:80/film/newsfeatures/microsites/T/tearjerkers/results/30-21.html to http://www.channel4.com/film/newsfeatures/microsites/T/tearjerkers/results/30-21.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]