Jump to content

Talk:The Lawnmower Man (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References to use

[edit]
Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
  • King, Mike (2008). "Lawnmower Man". The American Cinema of Excess: Extremes of the National Mind on Film. McFarland. p. 210. ISBN 0786439882.

Plot summaries

[edit]

Given the two plot summaries, does it even make sense to say that the 1992 film was "loosely based" on the King story? As far as I can tell, all they share is a title - no elements of the plot of the story seem to appear in the movie. john k 18:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The title is not the film's only Stephen King connection. Two scenes from King's version of The Lawnmower Man were in the movie, though in different contexts. The first is the remotely-controlled lawnmower chasing Harold Parkette through his house, smashing furniture before chasing him outside and killing him. The second is the police officer, after Harold's death, talking about "schizo-fucking-phrenia" and people being "crazy with the heat", telling another cop that the world is full of nuts and not to forget that, mentioning someone reporting Parkette being chased through his house with a lawnmower, and saying "birdbath" when a paramedic asks him where "the rest of him" is. There are a few other bits and pieces; the lawnmower man in both stories wears overalls and uses an "aged red power mower", and some of King's names were used (Harold, Carla, Parkette, Smith, Cooley, etc). Also, Dr. Angelo works for an organization called "The Shop" in the film. While never mentioned in King's version of The Lawnmower Man, The Shop was the organization featured in King's Firestarter novel and Golden Years miniseries. (FICT, 12 May 2006)

Computer Graphics

[edit]

I've often seen this film included on lists of landmark movies in the development of CG. But there's no mention of that on the page. Would be interesting to see a more detailed description of the effects that went into the film. Would have to be written by somebody who knows more than me, though. --Lurlock 18:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First time I ever remember seeing bump mapping in a commercial film.
Although I'm sure the algorithm goes back to blinn circa 1978. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.143.136.60 (talkcontribs) 03:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I was wandering about that. I came here because I vaguely remember this movie to have been hyped-up for its "revolutionary computer graphics" or some such (I remember seeing the actual CGI and being thoroughly disappointed :/). Does anyone have any info on the CGI hype in this movie's PR at the time of release? TomorrowTime (talk) 07:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phones Ringing

[edit]

Having all the World's 'phones ringing to signify a birth/emergence was used in an early Arthur C. Clarke story but I can't remember which. Can anybody fill that in? MarkMLl 13:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's Dial F for Frankenstein. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.15.84 (talk) 16:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lawnmower Man A.jpg

[edit]

Image:Lawnmower Man A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lawnmower Man.jpg

[edit]

Image:Lawnmower Man.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Video Game?

[edit]

Wasn't there a crappy super nintendo game based on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.60.117 (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep the game is available on Archive.org https://archive.org/details/sg_Lawnmower_Man_The_1994_Sales_Curve_Interactive_EU-US_en 202.89.137.33 (talk) 20:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CGI

[edit]

Can anyone explain what on earth this sentence means:

"...the CGi going on to establish a perception of VR, in many individuals mind, towards the reality of the technology, even though not filmed in real-time."

Can someone who knows what this is on about rewrite is to make sense, or maybe remove it, since there's no source.194.66.67.65 (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Box office take

[edit]

Can someone explain to me how The Lawnmower Man racked up around $30 mill at the US / Can box office but then managed to pull in $112 mill in other markets. That ratio is kind of like a 0.400 batting average -- impossible. I won't say that this fact is a lie... but... it's a lie. 2603:7000:7F00:3D96:99D4:B7AC:3B2E:4C37 (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

*see also* section

[edit]

This section currently lists three other films and a short story, with no indication as to why. I pride myself in not not being a total culture doofus, but I don't get it. Perhaps some explanation would be in order? Doceddi (talk) 19:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

all four share a strong connection in concept and theme while differing in execution, lucy and flowers both cover an extreme increase in intelligence and the effects thereof, and transcendence and ghost in the shell both cover the effects of becoming a digital lifeform. 14.2.35.99 (talk) 13:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of “Cobson” meme

[edit]

This article should note how the “Cobson” meme originated from a traced frame of Jobe Smith. It is quite a popular phenomenon, and thus deserves mention 2600:1008:B033:B1D0:1C9C:7739:AFFF:7C56 (talk) 03:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would need coverage by a reliable, third party source in order to even be considered for inclusion. Sergecross73 msg me 23:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]