Talk:The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Life and Death of 9413: a Hollywood Extra/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


I am about to start the review, full disclosure I am aWiki Cup and a GA Cup participant. If anyone would like to reciprocate I have my own GAN (Mexican National Trios Championship) needing a review and a Feature Article (CMLL World Heavyweight Championship) and Feature List (Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship) candidates in need of input. Not that it's a factor in my GA review. I usually provide my feedback in portions over a day or so, so don't be surprised if I keep popping in with stuff for a while.  MPJ-US  04:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

GA Toolbox[edit]

The GA tools provided usually provide a good place to start, so let's hit all those first.

Peer Review
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 35 mm, use 35 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 35 mm.
  • It is indicating that there may be weasel words in the article, as I review the article I will take a closer look at these.
Copyright violations tool
  • Reports as "Unlikely" Green tickY
Disambiguation Links

Green tickY no problems

External links

Green tickY no problems

We're off to a promising start.

Sources[edit]

All look good, reliable and correctly formatted. I do have a question since I am not familiar with the movie article standards, is it normal and acceptable to not source the plot section ?  MPJ-US  16:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Thanks for doing the review! Yes, per WP:FILMPLOT: "Since films are primary sources in their articles, basic descriptions of their plots are acceptable without reference to an outside source." — Hunter Kahn 02:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    • I thought that might be the case, thank you for confirming. I will be continuing the review now then.

Images[edit]

Appears to all have the appropriate licenses and are all free due to age and copyright rules. Green tickY

General Review[edit]

  • "Finally he dies" - comma after "finally" I believe
    • Done.
  • Is camerawork one word?
  • "at failing to achieve theirs dreams" = "their dreams"
    • Oops. LOL Fixed.
  • "shot in 35 mm film" - not sure if this is a common way to phrase it but I would have thought it would be "on 35 mm film"?
    • I think you're right. Changed.
  • "45 sets were build in" - use the word "built"
    • Oops again. LOL Changed.
  • "into squares, while Vorkapić" - does not need the comma
    • I've removed the comma.
  • "dehuminazation" should be "dehumanization"
    • Fixed it.
  • "Specators" should be "Spectators"
    • Changed it.
  • "the expressionistic manner" = "an expressionistic manner"?
    • Although your version is grammatically correct, the actual quote uses 'the expressionistic manner' so I think we have to stick with that.
      • If the quote uses it then it's not a problem.  MPJ-US  11:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
  • "eight musicians, and was" does not need the comma
    • Removed it.
  • That's all I got, which is the least amount of issues I've found during a GA review so far. Great job it's 99% there already. I am going to put this on hold for 7 days so you have time to fix it.  MPJ-US  11:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks very much for the review! — Hunter Kahn 03:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
      • Looks like everything I pointed out has been improved upon, I will do one more read through to ensure nothing else needs to be addressed. Great work so far.  MPJ-US  11:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

@Hunter Kahn: - After another read through I am satisfied that this meets the GA criteria. passed really good work, congratuations.  MPJ-US  12:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)