Talk:The Man in the Moon Stayed Up Too Late

The Man in the Moon Stayed Up Too Late has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 21, 2010	Articles for deletion	Kept
March 2, 2020	Articles for deletion	No consensus
July 2, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
July 8, 2021	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

Middle-earth Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Lord of the Rings (musical)

I’m very glad this article is a Good article now! There needs to be a mention of the use of this poem as a song in the Lord of the Rings musical. It’s a real thing! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Judgesurreal777: I've done what I can given the sources available. If you know of a source that actually analyses the version it'd be appreciated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidocumentaries version

The curious may like to know that a version of this article is at Wikidocumentaries. Presumably someone on the team liked the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]