Talk:The Memorandum

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Memorandum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Information

Perhaps someone could supply more information?

I read the play a few months ago so I do not remember all the details.

Also, I am not sure of how categories are listed. Could a more advanced user help?

VltavaMusicFanatic (talk) 06:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

should be on a separate page

Shouldn't the "disambiguation" page be separate from the article that is about a play by Vaclav Havel? There is a link from Memorandum that says, "For the play by Václav Havel, see The Memorandum (disambiguation)". So IMHO, in order to fix this correctly, not only would it have to be corrected, but that misguided link from Memorandum would have to be changed. (right?) --Mike Schwartz (talk) 19:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I actually wasn't quite sure then about how to do the link. Maybe you could help? Vltava 68 (talk contribs) 09:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:32, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Undue focus on Paul Wilson's translation

I think that there is undue focus on Paul Wilson's translation. There had been English translations prior to Wilson's and so having so many parentheticals discussing how characters are named in Wilson's translation is rather distracting. Any objections if I remove Wilson's character name translations? Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 20:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]