Talk:The Twelve Apostles (Victoria)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Australia / Victoria (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon The Twelve Apostles (Victoria) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria.
 
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for other than editorial assistance.

Good start to the article. Capitalistroadster 10:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Nooooooo!!!![edit]

[1] Well, it's always been inevitable.--Merbabu (talk) 12:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Additional information: Re-naming of Island Arch/way of Twelve Apostles[edit]

Hello, I would like to add that the two new stacks formed from the collapse of the Island Arch (or Island Archway as it's otherwise known) are now officially to be renamed Tom and Eva after the two teenagers who survived the sinking of the Loch Ard in 1878. I would also like to add a reference to the article (http://www.visitgreatoceanroad.org.au/great-ocean-road-news/new-great-ocean-road-apostles-named-tom-and-eva) which explains this on the official website http://visitgreatoceanroad.org.au and a link to the same site in external links. Aussiewriter (talk) 13:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

It seems an interesting fact to add, but would be more relevant for the Loch Ard Gorge article as Island Archway is viewed on one of the walks connected with that location. The simplest way of adding the citation is this: [2] or you can look at Wikipedia:Citation templates for more detailed citations. I would not support additionally adding an external link to that site or this one - it could be viewed as linkspam, especially if you are connected with the organisation. Melburnian (talk) 13:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you - will look at adding it there instead without the external link.Aussiewriter (talk) 18:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Remaining stacks[edit]

Can anyone shed some light on why a source says there are only 7 stacks remaining (with the last one falling in September 2009), while another source says that this stack was actually a part of a different formation? Which is true? Jwoodger (talk) 00:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

there are 8 left — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.199.127 (talk) 03:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)