Jump to content

Talk:The Unbelievers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lawrence Craig, random "dude", rebuttal

[edit]

Facts

[edit]

The following addition to the reception-section:

Christian apologist William Craig made three half hour podcasts about the film and its flaws and errors, on the basis of "illegally acquired" audio tapes, ahead of the film's official release, "intentionally" according to Krauss misrepresenting its content.

was deleted, with the comment:

a random dude making a snorefest podcast with no press about it except for Krauss giving him the time of day by saying he's wrong isn't notable

Arguments

[edit]

He (Sam Harris) called Craig "the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists."[1]

Craig is the most prolific[2] debator of atheists, who among many others has debated Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, Bart Ehrman and 3 times Lawrence Krauss.

Craig, considered one of today's leading Christian apologists, has authored or edited more than 40 books and over 150 journal articles, including his signature book Reasonable Faith. [3]

Conclusion

[edit]

William Craig is to be considered on the side of the "Believers to be just as prominent as Lawrence Krauss or Richard Dawkins are on the side of the "Unbelievers".

His reaction, i. e. the reaction of a leading "believer", to a massive attack of the leading "unbelievers" is to be considered relevant.


Quessler (talk) 12:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

[edit]