Talk:Thomas Lee (army captain)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / British / European / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Untitled

More editing to be done soon - please don't do anything in meantime. Thanks.--shtove 13:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Not moved. —Centrx→talk • 04:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Lee (army captain) → Thomas Lee – To restore this article to its original title, which was taken over by the stub article Thomas Lee (Virginia colonist) without discussion.

Survey

Oppose move I don't see that this Thomas Lee is overwhelmingly more notable than the member of the great Virginia family. Both are in DNB, and there is also a Restoration politician, whom we should probably put at Sir Thomas Lee, first baronet; and there are three others of variant spellings. The solution is to make Thomas Lee a disambiguation page. Septentrionalis 18:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move - so long as existing links to the original article title are preserved. At the moment, typing in Thomas Lee gets me nowhere near the original. Disambiguation is the right move, I guess.--Shtove 00:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

It would have been courteous to discuss the move first; but I think it is the right result. Septentrionalis 18:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My concern over the move was that existing links to other articles would be diverted, but I see User:Dinosaur puppy tried to cover this. There should have been discussion. Disambiguation is the way to go.--Shtove 00:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Vandalism?

Can someone check whether this is vandalism? Thanks much, delldot talk 09:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]