Talk:Thomas Tomkinson

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I disagree that "A System of Religion" is not targeted at orthodox Christians, it does not mention the authority of the prophets which would be strange if it were not an attempt to establish Muggletonianism within the framework of historic Christianity. MikeGnosis (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree your opinion. The problem, though, seems to be Tomkinson himself and it's too late to do anything about him. He says one thing then does another, I feel. Perhaps the article should be better written to bring out the point you make?Coxparra (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The past as a foreign country

Some typos have been altered in the article today, some correctly, but others more doubtfully. Tomkinson spells 'struggle' as 'strugle' and mystery as 'mistery' in the actual titles of his works and I feel they are better left the way he bequeathed them because, if anyone goes looking for them, those are the words for which they should look. But I don't suppose it matters greatly. However, I would take issue with removing 'atheistical'. It is the word Tomkinson uses about his opponent during the course of the argument that is referred to in the article. Argue with the article by all means but I think it's wrong to rewrite Tomkinson. So, unless anyone feels deeply upset, I propose to revert that one correction after a chance for other opinions to be made known.Coxparra (talk) 13:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]