Talk:Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995

Australia: New South Wales / Law / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

points are great

it would be great for examples (links to cases where the point is well illustrated) for the lists of points of the operation of the act - doesnt have to be every one, even just a few would break the potential it looks like another public servant has grabbed their act and put it here verbatim trap - the potential for footnotes/links to illustrate the functions or the issues at stake would make it unique and much more encyclopediac - there are heaps of stubs about government authorities with lists of things and not a footnote or link in site addressing any of the points JarrahTree 11:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wow well beyond the usual repository of authority rules or principles - excellent! JarrahTree 14:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your great examples. MargaretRDonald (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not very pleased with the way they have gone in - maybe a different section for actions that have had the act specifically mentioned in cases , and the plans and draft proposals in a another - and actually addressing what they involved rather than being tacked on... but thats just being picky with my own edit - and not asking anyone else necessarily to do the thing.. JarrahTree 15:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

careful reading /or knowledge of the context of the range of items in https://trove.nla.gov.au/book/result?q=NSW+Threatened+Species+Conservation+Act+1995+%28TSC+Act%29 - suggests something close to a novella - there are elements of the responses to the act and its ramifications JarrahTree 15:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]