This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV dispute: The article "Tim Echols" edited heavily by WP editor named timechols

I believe the edits to this article from January 4-5, 2015, violate WP:COI, WP:SPS, WP:SOAP, WP:NPOV, among others. Could an editor with intimate knowledge of both WP policy and this article's subject, such as @ytea, please weigh in here? TP anonymous (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no such intimate knowledge. However, these edits clearly need revision and it has been conducted. @ytea _{say howdy!} 14:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed a sentence that I know to be an incorrect conclusion regarding a controversy listed by @tp_anynymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timechols (talk • contribs) 00:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I live in the state and have made corrections and found additional citations. It is accurate now though the photos probably should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnergyExpertGA (talk • contribs) 21:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy isn't the issue, EnergyExpertGA. The article lacks significant detail on a number of its claims and generally reads like a promotional flyer for its subject. It was mostly written and maintained by the person that is its subject, which is why McMatter put the tag on it. His tag should stay, in my opinion, but I am open to other opinions. TP anonymous (talk) 01:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Current issues with this article

Truett Cathy story may be important to the subject's personal autobiography, but it is not relevant to an encyclopedia entry.
Phrases like "diversity in energy sources" and "supporter of energy efficiency," references to his family's energy use, or bills he has opposed read like campaign policy documents.
Several references are absent of sufficient detail, such as (among many others):

"Echols has written about the top five energy issues facing Georgia." - How is this relevant? What are these issues and what did he write about them?
"Echols weighed in on the Georgia Right to Life controversy" - What was the controversy and how did he weigh in?
"Echols' efforts at events like PGA tournaments made a real difference" - Again, what were the efforts, and what difference did they make, and does this difference violate neutral point of view requirements?

This statement: "Echols upon election added solar thermal to his house in Winterville, GA causing some to wonder why a Republican was being so progressive." - This claim is not supported by the article linked and is tonally a bit off for an encyclopedia entry. Again, there is more than a little campaign policy document flavor to this.

There are other examples, but this is a start to help EnergyExpertGA understand the problem. Accuracy isn't the problem. The intimate and promotional tone of the article comes directly from its having been written and edited by its subject. This is why McMatter's autobiography tag is so important. I am eager to have others weigh in. TP anonymous (talk) 01:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that article still reads like a promotional autobio. Removed unnecessary story from bio and pictures. I think more clean up and trimming need to be done to get red of the NPOV tag.108.195.234.31 (talk) 04:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bio Removal

The bio info was sourced from the exact same website as the material you reverted to. It is personal info on the new updated state website. There is no copyright infringement.

Sourced from and copied from are 2 different things, a cut and paste copy from a site with a restricted copyright is copyright infringement and not allowed by law or on Wikipedia. This doesn't even encroach on the overly detailed and promotional tone on the writing of the bio you copied from the government site, which is also not allowed. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 23:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]