Talk:Tom Terry (author)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Untitled

something fishy is going on here :) cant exactly call this article "neutral"...

Edits made to the article to clean up POV.

Religious intolerance

So this person belongs to so called "Campus Crusade for Christ". They never tell what sect of Christianity they are promoting. Eagle TV denies (quite wrathfully) interviews to job applicants who had connections with some sects of Christianity. Could anyone tell me what the reason for the hostility between "Campus Crusade for Christ" and "Jehova's Witnesses" is? Gantuya eng (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with the details here, but in the end, it probably just boils down to competition between two organisations with strong missionary focus. In such situations, religion is usually just a pretext for a "we are right, everybody else is wrong" type of attitude. --Latebird (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They can't get those heretics get into their turf, can they? ;-) I think one reason might be that Jehova's witnesses preach a somewhat special kind of christianity. Not as special as the Mormons, but still more different from Tom Terry's evangelism, say, the catholics, or other protestant groups, or maybe even the Orthodoxs. But I'm not really interested in this kind of stuff, so I can't provide any details. All I can say is that Christianity has a certain history of violent conflicts about who is right or wrong. Or at least of violent conflicts using this as pretext. See for example Thirty years war Yaan (talk) 14:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We really should create a seperate article Eagle TV. If we can source stuff like this, then that would be interesting material. --Latebird (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Whyyoushouldownoneofthese.jpg

Image:Whyyoushouldownoneofthese.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]