Talk:Too Lost in You

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Too Lost in You article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Too Lost in You was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 11, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Too Lost in You/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 10:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sugababes' performance → Is this vocal performance?
What do you mean by the song being a rendition of another?
it as a contender for the 2004 Christmas number one. → Wouldn't it be 2003? It would become a number one 12 months later in December 2004
E3 to C#5 isn't two Octaves. E3-E5 would be two Octaves.
Why are Critical response and Commercial performance sub-sections? They are longer than Composition yet that is a standalone section.
A release history table would be nice.

Status

Very well written article, as always. On hold. — AARON • ^TALK 16:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator hasn't been online for nearly 4 weeks, assuming he is on holiday or become inactive for whatever reason. Failing as a result. — AARON • ^TALK 18:32, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.