Talk:Touch of My Hand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Is it just me, or are most of the professional reviews just a little POV? They focus 90% on the good reviews - the Rolling Stone review is really the only one that could be taken as possibly negative. What do you all think? -WikiFiend90 05:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm really new to this, therefore don't know what I'm doing, but why is the picture of her performing "Breathe on Me" on here? Someone needs to find a photo of her performing "Touch of My Hand" cos the other photo really isn't relevent - I think it should be removed. Babooshka2002 00:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Touch of My Hand/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 20:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Lead[edit]

  • Balewa Muhammad, and Sheppard Solomon → comma is superfluous here
  • and produced by Harry and Solomon → while production was handled by Harry and Solomon (word rep.)
  • contemporary critics → link to Music journalism

Infobox[edit]

  • November 12, 2003 (album) → November 12, 2003 (via album)
  • As a writer, please only state "Spears" and not her full name
  • "Trip hop" is not sourced in the article, so remove it

Background[edit]

  • Spears previewed the song to Quddus Philippe → state "The singer" here for alternation
  • I really love the vibe of "Touch of My Hand." → I really love the vibe of 'Touch of My Hand'.

Composition[edit]

  • Unlink Britney Spears here and only state her last name
  • link the two genres
  • "out of control." → " before full stop
  • The lyrics of the song are about the act of masturbation: → As aforementioned, the lyrics are about the act of masturbation (unlink):
  • The song received many comparisons to the work of Madonna. → Shouldn't you merge this into "Reception"?
  • "nearly eight-minute trance remix," → " before comma

Reception[edit]

  • contemporary music critics → link to Music journalism
  • Ruth Mitchell of BBC Music called the song → Use "track" here for alternation
  • club sound of "Vogue"-era → club sound of 'Vogue'-era

Live performances[edit]

  • from the "Toxic" → from her "Toxic" (2003)
  • You don't need three paragraphs here; you can combine all of them if you want to
  • You can add an image here from one of her controversial performances

Credits and personnel[edit]

  • Unlink the album

Other stuff[edit]

Copy-violation[edit]

  • 62.5% is too much! Please look at the first source and try to reword it.

Sample[edit]

  • Sample seems stable.

Links[edit]

References[edit]

  • As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article
  • 2 dead links! Please fix!

Outcome[edit]

  • @Cartoon network freak: Could you allow me additional time for work on this article. There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding whether or not this article is notable. I would like to gain a clear consensus of this article's future before making these changes to it. Regards, Carbrera (talk) 01:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC).
  • @Cartoon network freak: I apologize for interrupting this review, but I would suggest failing this until the notability of the article is established. If the article is established as notable, then it can be revised and nominated again for GAN. How does that sound @Carbrera:? It seems that it will take more time a clear consensus to be reached about this article's future. Aoba47 (talk) 17:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Failing this per suggestion. As aforementioned, if the article is going to be kept, you can renominate. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.