Jump to content

Talk:Transposition (law)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Changes

[edit]

I've removed the following from the article because of the reason given.

"Directives carry today a high level of legislation based on best state of the art, consensus of interested parties and good practice."

Sorry but this just make sense. I don't know what any of it means.
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. BASED ON THE EUROPEAN TREATY, EUROPEAN LEGISLATION DOES NOT AIM AT A COMMON MINIMUM BUT AIM TOWARDS THE BEST STATE OF THE ART. THIS WHY THIS LEGISLATION HAS SUCH A WIDE WORLD IMPACT. WE SHOULD DEVELOP THIS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alain.souloumiac (talk • contribs) Jan 24, 2009
There's no need to should and please sign your posts. I think I kind of understand what you're trying to say now, but it's still very poorly written. (Nothing personal) — Blue-Haired Lawyer 10:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The first part of my contribution has been erased because the reader “doesn’t know any of it means”. It concerns European transposition and good governance (best state of the art, consensus of interested parties and good practice).

This reveals some of the difficulties to share freedom, experience and respect in order to cooperate, built and maintain this wonderful common encyclopedia called Wikipedia. '

First obstacle, no doubt may be language. Babylon myth has been and still is a major barrier to Law, World justice and World peace. Thanks to history, we have now a common language in which many cultures may exchange.

In this context, one should refrain from using any argument based on his superiority from a linguistic point of view to exclude thoughts produced by non-native English speaking people. This kind of practice can only weaken this World Encyclopaedia by restricting its use to a small minority and deserves its cause by preferring words to realities (nothing personal).

Thoughts are the most essential part of human beings. This is the reason why many legislators have agreed to consider that freedom of thinking should benefit of human rights protection. The duty to Lawyers to consider rights and not encourage infringements against laws and values (even for motives of Raison d’Etat) is of “known importance”.

To this respect, I would personally advise my contradictor to review his lower comment related to State and Human infringements.

One should improve any formulation that appears awkward, but should not remove and erase the thinking of a human being just because he thinks he owns a right from the advantage of a mother language.

Using pseudonyms is a liberty, which should be respected. But a person disguising his true identity behind the mask of “Blue Haired Lawyer” should not dare argue of his hidden identity against someone who has the courage to speak in full light and sign under a real name.

As “Blue Haired Lawyer” points out: “This just does not make sense”…

Hoping my English is not too poor and that this few words will no have been written in vane - to find some time to rebuilt in a more relevant way the ideas that have now been destroyed - and that they will be received in a more friendly environment..;'' Alain.souloumiac (talk) 16:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I give a real name on my user page. Please take my advice: go to French Wikipedia and edit there. At least this way you'll get an idea of what Wikipedia is all about. I just don't think your level of English is up to the required standard to edit here, nothing personal. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 17:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


"Transposition faces delays and compliance problems. In july 2008, 467 directives were not transposed on time in the 27 Member States. 1 298 prosecutions were opened by the Commission against Member States for non compliance."

This point is repeated from the Directive (European Union) article.
THIS POINT NEED ALSO MORE COMMENT. HOW COME MEMBER STATES FACE SUCH PROBLEM. WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF PRIVATE PERSONS WOULD BEHAVE IN SUCH A WAY. THE COST OF THIS ENORMOUS. PRESENT CRISIS MAY BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alain.souloumiac (talk • contribs) Jan 24, 2009
This is pretty much how people do behave. We discuss failure to implement in the [Directive (European Union)] article. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 10:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
THIS WILL BE PART OF FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS WHERE ADMITTED. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Construire (talk • contribs) Jan 24, 2009
If it's written as badly, I hope not. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 10:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Implementation of directives and European legislation costs 4.5% GNP to Member States."

As far as I know, this is more money than we spend on the EU itself.

"Commission considers that 1/3 of this amount is unjustified - e.g. 150 billions Euros per year. It has launched the programme Better Regulation to spare 1/3 of this amount by 2012."

See my previous point.
THESE ARE THE FIGURES GIVEN BY THE COMMISSION (COM(2006) 689-90-691) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alain.souloumiac (talk • contribs) Jan 24, 2009
What here? The figure refers to the possible benefits of better regulation to the economy in general, from better regulation in general. Not EU specific. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 10:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Major improvements may be achieved through quality implementation process and Computer Aided Transposition."

Please read Wikipedia'a policies on expressing a neutral point of view.
USE OF COMPUTER DID BRING SOME PROGRESS IN DECISION, ACCOUNTANCY AN REPORT MAKING. SEVERAL CASES (see below) DEMONSTRATE THE MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS BROUGHT BY QUALITY IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS AND COMPUTER AIDED TRANSPOSITION. THE COMMISSION LAUNCHED SURVEYS IN 2002 ABOUT THE USE OF COMPUTER (DATABANKS) WHICH SHOW THAT MEMBER STATES MAKE A VERY POOR USE OF COMPUTERS IN THIS MATTER WHEN THEY DO. NEUTRAL EXPERTISE HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED ON THIS MATTER. THIS INFORMATION SHOULD ALSO BE DEVELOPPED. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alain.souloumiac (talk • contribs) Jan 24, 2009

"Computer Aided Transposition is a legistic technology that aims at providing timely transposition, full compatibility and quality implementation. Several projects led in Bulgaria, Cambodia, Estonia, Poland and Vietnam showed the efficiency in these fields of well designed softwares."

As far as I can see this is basically an advertisement. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 22:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
REFERRING TO A TOOL LIKE COMPUTER MAY NOT BE UNDERSTOOD AS "ADVERTISEMENT". NO TRADE MARK IS REFERRED TO. INFORMATION FOR PROGRESS... SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS PROGRESS... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alain.souloumiac (talk • contribs) Jan 24, 2009
There's only one company that do this "Computer Aided Transposition" thing and you run it!! — Blue-Haired Lawyer 10:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Transposition (law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Transposition (law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Transposition_(law)&oldid=1204594932"