Talk:Trevor Packer

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV dispute

I believe large parts of this article violate Wikipedia's policies on NPOV.

First of all, large parts of the article state opinion as facts. "Packer's leadership has focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion" is an opinion, not a fact. The claim that Packer is responsible for "Hispanic/Latino students are now the largest population of AP students in states such as California and Texas" is an opinion, not a fact. The claim that Packer is responsible for "nearly one in every four (24%) AP students comes from a low-income household" is an opinion, not a fact. "As a result, AP Biology teachers were delighted" is an opinion, not a fact and is a completely unverifiable claim. There are far more examples like this in the article, which I believe the other editors will be able to find.

Secondly, the article structure gives undue weight to the Washington Post article while segregating any controversies to other sections. The Washington Post did not call Trevor responsible for making the AP program the most powerful educational tool in the country, the education columnist Jay Mathews did. As well, the Washington Post article and the College Board are generally reliable, but they are in no way neutral sources, and any opinions they provided should not be taken as fact. Freedom4U (talk) 20:05, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth is needed.--2A00:1FA0:4895:657A:0:6B:460B:8701 (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]