Talk:Trial and conviction of Alfred Dreyfus
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trial and conviction of Alfred Dreyfus redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Trial and conviction of Alfred Dreyfus. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Trial and conviction of Alfred Dreyfus at the Reference desk. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Intro[edit]
We need to say who Major Bexon d'Ormescheville represented, and who appointed him. In general the I think the introduction should set the stage for someone who has not read the previous articles in the series. The tone of the whole article is still somewhat antiquated. Rich Farmbrough 16:22 3 May 2006 (UTC).
Please delete this ridiculously written article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.175.214 (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Article has no sources[edit]
I can't find a single source or citation in this article. I've added a unreferenced tag to the top as a result. Please add some sources for anything new or anything already existing in this article. ResurgamII 13:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC) This is a poorly written, undocumented, incomplete piece of work that is a disgrace and an insult to the memory of The late Alfred Dreyfus and to his family. Gerard D. March 5,2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.8.103 (talk) 05:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
This "article" is incomprehensible. There is no structure. There is no way to deduce even what the charges are. Bad. Written by dummies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.175.214 (talk) 16:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)