Talk:Trickling filter

Bendel boy, would you please give some thought to merging this Trickling filter article with the Biological trickling filters (Biofilters)? There really is no reason to have two articles covering the same subject ... and I see nothing to be gained by that.

I also think that the merged article should be named Trickling filter rather than the much more cumbersome Biological trickling filters (Biofilters). - mbeychok 20:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea how to rename a page.

The creation of two articles by the same name is because when I looked for existing material I didn't get a hit with 'biological trickling filters' - I set up redirects for the various names I knew, and have now set trickling filter to redirect to biological trickling filter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bendel boy (talk • contribs) 08:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Septic drain field / Tricking filter merge

From what I understand about biofilms, a septic drain field is functionally identical to the methods of a trickling filter. There really is no reason to keep them separate, and so trickling filter should be the main article since it is more general of the two articles, and septic drain field becoming a redirect. DMahalko (talk) 19:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should be 2 separate articles. Although the principles are the same, my understanding is that significant differences come into play due to differences between soil and controlled filter bed materials, which eliminates the need to account for individual soil characteristics, but introduces other issues. Causes of failure are quite different, for instance. You don't see soil failure due to redistribution of the silt fraction, and you don't see mineral carbon/iron precipitation in soil, both problems that dog sand medium. Soil has a large set of issues that don't apply to filter beds. Consequently, I feel more comfortable keeping these as two separate articles. Plus it is what I expect that the reader expects. --Paleorthid (talk) 21:59, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely with Paleorthid that the two articles be kept separate. Now that there has been 2 months for discussion and no one else has commented, I will remove the merger proposal tag. mbeychok (talk) 04:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that the two should be kept separate. The trickling filter is typically an above ground aerobic environment followed by a clarifier. The septic drain field is an underground anaerobic or facultative environment integrated with a percolation disposal system. I will remove the merger tag from the drain field article. Thewellman (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

In-line reference citations should be provided for each section, and preferably for each paragraph, to improve WikiProject Engineering quality classification.Thewellman (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Trickling filter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728064144/http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/CE/msaleh/ChE%20107.11March06.ppt to http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/CE/msaleh/ChE%20107.11March06.ppt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]