Talk:Tropical Storm Grace (2009)

Tropical Storm Grace (2009) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
March 16, 2010	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
October 16, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Best Track

The Best Track data lowers Grace's peak to 55 knots, but takes it 50.7 degrees north, with no indications that it was extratropical. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

Info concerning operational vs. after the fact storm designations

I personally find this interesting information, even if it is potentially embarassing. It might be worth adding similar information into other tropical cyclone-related articles. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GAN

I think it's ready for GAN now. Lots of good info, easily the most comprehensive account of the storm available. Also, there are a couple pictures of the storm's outskirts on Flickr, which I've requested be released under a more compatible license. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Grace (2009)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks to be in order now. Lots of useful info, well-sourced and well-composed. I'd suggest taking it to FAC sometime. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map

FWIW, here is a self-made and approximate map of the three northeasternmost-forming TCs. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meteo France

Judging by this press release it seems that Meteo France thought that operationally Grace was a subtropical cyclone.Jason Rees (talk) 04:26, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tropical Storm Grace (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.metcheck.com/V40/UK/HOME/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:37, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]