This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
The forgeries section seems a bit odd, and not even very accurate; for one thing, for the items to be forgeries, they would have to intend to duplicate an original in all respects (even if unsuccessful at it), and have been passed off as something that they weren’t; however as the “True-View” was not being sold to buyers as being a “Tru-Vue”, and there is no support for it being an attempt to fool the buyer, the general term for something like that would be a knock-off. But more importantly, the link doesn’t support the contention that there was even any illegality taking place, as it clearly offers the possibility that there might have been a license granted to produce it - but nobody knows. So suggesting the True-View was a forgery seems contentious at best. Jock123 (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]