Talk:Tyto robusta

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birds Low‑importance

Tyto robusta is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Merge?[edit]

Technically I'd be against it, but in ths particular case...

poorly resolved taxonomy (would have to await the Pavia/Göhlich paper based on their 2004 talk. No indication it's upcoming soon, but then I didn't ask them)
at the present state, all that would be different is size and prey spectrum
images are of course entirely conjectural as to color and do not provide significant information (size, namely); we would be better off with simple sketches comparing the 3 Gargano owls to Tyto alba' and Bubo bubo...

The Pavia/Göhlich paper is crucial. I might ask them, especially as regards the question of sexual size dimorphism... there should be 2 distinct size clusters visible in any significant sample of owl bones of any one species living or extinct (see HBW measurement data); one only has to think of the Rodrigues Owl and Mauritius Owl to become very very cautious. Mlikovsky's lumpings have a very bad track record, but the "3 species" scenario is by no means parsimonious either. I'd have no problem believing it if the Pavia/Göhilch data is good (Göhlich's data is usually not bad at the least) and if sexual dimorphism is covered, but if not... Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 01:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should we merge them together under "Gargano Barn Owl"?--Mr Fink (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because of T. balarica on Gargano, maybe Giant Mediterranean Barn-owl? If there will be 2 pages eventually, they can be split off but "G.M.B." could redirect to a page Giant Barn-owl where the two and their confused taxonomic history could be listed in brief, plus the Caribbean species. Or maybe Giant owl? That would have like 5 sections and links to (then) 4 taxon pages already - not bad for starters. Think Dwarf elephant.

BTW the new JVP has a few papers that might interest you: http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-toc&issn=0272-4634&volume=27&issue=4 Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 04:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That could work... And I wish I had a subscription.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]