Talk:UEFA Euro 2012 venues

Text and/or other creative content from this version of UEFA Euro 2012 venues was copied or moved into UEFA Euro 2012#Venues with this edit on 21:42, 22 June 2012. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merge discussion for merging UEFA Euro 2012 venues into UEFA Euro 2012[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was a merge between UEFA Euro 2012#Venues and UEFA Euro 2012 venues

I think it would be a good idea to merge this article (UEFA Euro 2012 venues) into the main article. Very little of the info in the article is not already in the main article and the article will not likely to be expanded much in the future. Jack Bornholm (talk) 08:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - unncessary article for the same info from the main article.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 09:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - same reason, repeated info, this article is not needed Chris1834 (talk) 09:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - same reason again. Duplicated info. - Svefnpurka (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - It's mostly if not all on the main page anyway - no need for another article. 188.221.79.22 (talk) 13:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - This infatuation with having every little thing on separate pages is not just annoying, but harmful, as it makes it harder on non-regulars to find information. This is also Sven Manguard 13:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - As per most of the above. Just make sure all the info here appears on the main page properly. I think this could be considered supported enough for to be actionable immediately. Jimthing (talk) 00:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 14:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

:Support. Short and redundant, easily merged. Reywas92^Talk 17:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Same reasons as above.

Support - The separate articles listed provide very little bonus information. Since they can be tied to Euro 2012 closely anyway, there's really no point to have them on their own. TomyHun (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Plain duplication of content already present in the main article. Parutakupiu (talk) 22:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Can be easily merged in the main article. No need to duplicate info. ChristianT (talk) 12:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above. Article contains very little content, which isn't already on UEFA Euro 2012. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{WrestleMania XXVIII} _{The Undertaker 20–0} 16:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.