Talk:United States Bicycling Hall of Fame

United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Cycling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I didn't know there was minimum criteria for a stub article, and that having only one external link is criteria for "speedy deletion".

I will fix this in the next few days.

If you plan to do this soon-ish, you could add a {{editing}} tag to the top of the page and get rid of the {{db|...}} one. But you might find it gets deleted in the meantime - you can always recreate it once you've compiled your information. (Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way.)-Splash 01:13, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. Hopefully it qualifies as a stub now. I dare not remove the db line since the warning says the article creator shouldn't. - Serge 01:25, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Temp page created

Sorry about the possible copyright infringment. Makes sense. I have a replacement "Temp" page ready to go. Thanks. -Serge 23:42, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Inductee Categories

The USBHOF web site is internally inconsistent between the Inductee List and Inductee Portfolio.

Should we standardize on the categories in Inductee Portfolio buttons?

BMX
Contributor
Off Road
Mountain Biking
Road & Track Pre-1945
Road & Track 1945-1975
Road & Track Post-1975

Or use "Modern" and "Veteran" as in the biographies?

Or the categories in the Inductee List table?

BMX
Contributor
Modern Road & Track
Modern Road & Track Competitor
Modern Road & Track Competitor (1945-1975)
Modern Road & Track Competitor (Post-1975)
Mountain Biking
Off-Road
Off-Road Competitor
Special Recognition
Veteran Road & Track Competitor
Veteran Road & Track Competitor (1970 & Prior)
Veteran Road & Track Competitor (Pre-1945)

I like the Portfolio list, but it needs Special Recognition to be complete.

The mapping from List categories would be (with individual exceptions as makes sense):

BMX -> BMX
Contributor -> Contributor
Modern Road & Track -> Road & Track Post-1975
Modern Road & Track Competitor -> Road & Track Post-1975
Modern Road & Track Competitor (1945-1975) -> Road & Track 1945-1975
Modern Road & Track Competitor (Post-1975) -> Road & Track Pre-1945
Mountain Biking -> Mountain Biking
Off-Road -> Off Road
Off-Road Competitor -> Off Road
Special Recognition -> Special Recognition
Veteran Road & Track Competitor -> Road & Track 1945-1975
Veteran Road & Track Competitor (1970 & Prior) -> Road & Track 1945-1975
Veteran Road & Track Competitor (Pre-1945) -> Road & Track Pre-1945 TimberFeller (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]