Talk:United States v. AT&T (1982)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
So shört an article
[edit]This case took 6 years and was a well-known landmark case, yet our article is only 2k bytes. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
I agree, particularly given its potential relevance to the present-day tech giants. Why has this been given importance low in the law and US wikiprojects? 79.64.5.171 (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- WikiProject US, I understand; it's not the most important topic in general relevance to the US, but it is one of the more important lawsuits as it pertains to antitrust law, and that's not exactly insignificant. (Saltedjules) 07:16, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Wow. I never imagined that this extremely important case, with its enormous ramifications, would have only a stub in Wikipedia. Badly needs filling out. MikeR613 (talk) 14:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- If any of you are still here, we needed someone to finally come along and give this article the detail it deserved. I just did it. Enjoy. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 20:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- much appreciated Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- If any of you are still here, we needed someone to finally come along and give this article the detail it deserved. I just did it. Enjoy. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 20:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)