Talk:United States v. Extreme Associates, Inc.

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials not "obscene"

The materials should not be described as "obscene", since no jury and no judge has found them to be so. Claims of prosecutors don't mean anything.

Also, it might be nice to link to the initial lower court's decision. AxelBoldt 04:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello 39.39.108.255 (talk) 06:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional versus Real

Assumedly at least some of these videos are fictional depictions (e.g. the one featuring Osama bin Laden) but the article does not mention which are fictional depictions and which are real. Pimlottc 20:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is especially important in the mention of Extreme Teen 24's supposed "pre-teen talked into sex" bit. I'm sure it was staged, obviously, but this needs to be clarified in the article somehow. Jeff Silvers 07:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The ruling of 2007

1st Feb 2007 has now come and gone. Maybe it's time for somebody to find out what the ruling was, and update the page. I would do it myself, but it would probably be easier for someone in America to do it, as they wouldn't have to rely on dubious internet sources. Branfish 03:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I tried looking it up onilne... Nothing is listed the Internet for what happened. I couldn't even find published court documents for 2/1/07 (although I did find ones from 2005). However, judging by their website, I don't think it's affected Extreme Associates' business any. I suppose we can assume the outcome was in their favor, since nothing is listed on their website for the case. As for what's actually there, I seriously doubt it needs to be elaborated on... --TheSlyFox 16:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]