Talk:United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Help me make this article great
[edit]I notice that the article is tagged as needing additional citations. What, other than the primary source, could make this a better article?Jojhutton (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, primary sources are discouraged, see WP:PRIMARY. Citations are needed from secondary sources, such as media coverage or in this case law review articles would be good too. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
This article does not read nearly as polished as most Supreme Court opinions on the site. It's primarily direct quotes and odd explanations. Can anybody expand it and include commentary from critical secondary sources such as law review articles? Additionally, the citation formatting used is incorrect. Charlie Avocado (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Low-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles