Talk:Unjárga

	Norway portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this redirect.

Cities

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Move

I intend to move the article back to it's original name, instead of the official name, as per the Wikipedia official policy on naming conventions. The move to the official name was not discussed here first, and here is my rationale for moving it back:

WP:NAME states that an article should have the name that is most common in use
- The municipality is in Norway, therefore its Norwegian name is obviously the most common name in everyday use
- In official signage kommune, gielda/suohkan etc is included
The Norwegian and Sami language wikis have their articles named in those languages respectively, not both
Similar examples of this are en:Helsinki/fi:Helsinki/sv:Helsingfors and en:Cardiff/cy:Caerdydd

As the municipality has a significant amount of Sami speakers, I can understand it if someone feels the article should be moved to the Sami name. However, for the reasons above, I think the correct place is under its Norwegian name. - BsL 00:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per argument in Talk:Porsanger. I suggest the discussion continues there.Labongo 09:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]