Talk:Uri Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Untitled[edit]

As with the GNP, the content reads like a media-centric generalization of political parties in Korea. Definately needs better structuring and additional information. And those who like to edit the article, please do so after registering. Showing just an ip really hurts your credibility.

--Steviecnd 21:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I would prefer to see this page moved to Uri Party. Most English-language media refers to the party as such. Are there any reasons for keeping the page here? --Iceager 00:44, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing. -- Visviva 01:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I agree Electionworld 06:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I've done the page move. Talrias (t | e | c) 11:09, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

No, it was not my inadvertence to delete a paragraph related to Chinese Communist Party. The paragraph seems just out of context, not in any way worth describing. noirum June 28, 2005 08:39 (UTC)

In what sense is it not worth describing? You don't think that an agreement between Uri and the CCP (which is the main sponsor of the KWP is in any way significant? --Ce garcon 19:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Reword[edit]

I took this last paragraph out:

"...while neglecting to devote any attention to the numerous transgressions by North Korea, such as the failure to cooperate with the six party talks, manufacture of counterfeit U.S. dollars, illicit sales of arms to terrorist countries, and border provocations in the demilitarized zone."

While there could be some truth to that statement, until it is sourced and verifiable, and less POV, I don't think it's worth keeping.Paj.meister 22:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Merge with the UNDP[edit]

Although truly difficult in mind, personally, someone should mention about this recent political chaos(changes) in South Korea. I did it(briefly). Does anyone who help to fill more? Peterhansen2032 08:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)