Talk:Ust-Ordynsky

Russia: Physical geography / Human geography Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

October 2006

How about "north bank" or "south bank" of the river instead of right bank?—Preceding unsigned comment added by McTrixie (talk • contribs)

But right bank isn't the same as south bank. There is always a right bank, but there may be no north/south bank. Does it matter in this particular case? Is there any specific reason you want the wording changed?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the river, the wording is fine; it sounds interesting to have a right and left bank, could be worth an explanation? --McTrixie 21:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The right bank of the river is the side to one's right while facing downstream while the left bank is the one opposite the right bank. It's a standard geography definition, which is available through the Right Bank disambiguation. Or were you looking for something different?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 22:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Popular culture reference

Just wondering if Colossus_(comics)' origins in the Ust-Ordynsky Collective should be mentioned here. GPask (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't belong here; sorry. See MOS:POPCULT for the applicable guideline. There just is no encyclopedic connection between the comics and the inhabited locality. A mention of Ust-Ordynsky is warranted in the comics article, but not the other way around.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 30, 2015; 19:05 (UTC)