Talk:Vacuum genesis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Physics (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Astronomy (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Vacuum genesis is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This article is out of date. The expansion rate of the universe is now known to be accelerating, not slowing down. The article needs to be rewritten or deleted.Coffent (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

for the missing citation about the omega value, one could propably use the 2015 Data from the plank spacecraft; it has already been linked elsewhere on wikipedia, but i don not feel qualified to do so. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1502.01589 http://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/planck/publications — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.192.48.215 (talk) 14:54, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

This comment moved from the body of the article to here:

The article appears to be inconsistent in its discussion of omega.
It first states: "If omega is more than one, the universe will eventually stop expanding and will thus collapse in on itself to again form another fireball not unlike the one from which it came."
Then, five sentences later it states: "The universe's rate of expansion is accelerating and is projected to continue accelerating due to dark energy, thus omega must be greater than 1."

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3756:180:996A:B106:A0C9:339 (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2015 (UTC)