Talk:Veriff

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Estonia Low‑importance

Veriff is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

Missing History[edit]

Big lawsuit missing, they were sued for collecting biometrics, they settled instead of facing the law. It's known as:

McGowan, et al. v. Veriff, Inc. Case No. 2021L001202 (Cir. Ct. Dupage Cnty.)

Contested deletion[edit]

"This page is not unambiguously promotional, because" the subject has international coverage (I'd say its coverage proves notability already), it is one of the leading tech companies in its homeland, and I tried to avoid any promotional language that might have come from the sources (any improvements would be welcome). Of course, I understand that for some people, nothing relevant can ever come from a small country, but that's not actually a valid reason for speedy deletion. The automatic template says, "This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic." Well, there is not a single reference to the company's own materials, everything has been taken from sources with editorial control and I'd say they're as neutral as tech journalism gets. So, if someone wants to delete it, I'd like to see actual arguments, not just a template. --Ehitaja (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the context: I've noticed that although IT sector is quite relevant for Estonia, its coverage in the English Wikipedia is shabby at best. So, I thought I'd start with one company, see how it goes, then maybe continue with an overview of the field and other companies. Of course, judging the notability of commercial organizations often turns into a mess, but "economy is evil, let's not write about it" is still not a sensible guideline. --Ehitaja (talk) 17:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion concerning the article's merits and non-merits here. --Ehitaja (talk) 21:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No logo?[edit]

Huh? 209.52.88.76 (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

added Estopedist1 (talk) 06:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate for Wikipedia[edit]

This entire page is merely marketing material from the company's web site. 2601:1C1:8400:A450:456C:7146:9A9D:2C39 (talk) 08:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]