Talk:Vernier Software & Technology

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Article name

It looks like the media calls this company "Vernier", so I propose it be renamed "Vernier" or "Vernier Software" per WP:NCCN. The company logo just says "Vernier", which supports this theory. Thoughts? tedder (talk) 01:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. They are the first several results from a search engine. --Niehusa (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision suggestions

I am unsure what some of your comments are in reference to Tedder, maybe you or some other can explain it to me. I will work on making the sections flow more smoothly, but suggestions would be appreciated.--Niehusa (talk) 20:04, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's the context here? tedder (talk) 22:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am unclear what all of your comments mean, I am afraid I do not understand your shorthand. "(ce lede, try to resection (I'm not happy with "company" and the section ordering), rm data collections para: slightly too advert-ish, and doesn't belong on this page (will expand rationale on talk page if requested))."

I will work on reordering things so they make more sense, and I would like some more explanation on the removal of the data collection paragraph. I had intended it to reflect the business partnerships of the company, not to be an advert. In comparison to many other articles I have read (ex. Norton AntiVirus, Symantec or the featured article "Idlewild and Soak Zone") I did not think that it was advert-ish. I listing of all or the most popular products would be inappropriate, but I have seen it done on other pages (again, Norton AntiVirus, another featured article "Oliver Typewriter Company.") My intent was to be more in line with the Products section of the BAE Systems page. I am sure that significant work must be done to bring this article to the proper state, but I am more than willing to make it so. Your help is greatly appreciated.--Niehusa (talk) 04:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Niehusa. I'll break down the shorthand:

ce: copyedit. (general cleanup)
lede: the lede or lead of the article- all text above the table of contents or first section.
try to resection: I added the "==Company==" section, but I'm not thrilled with the name of it or the location it occurs in the article. But it's better than nothing, and will hopefully be improved.
data collections: I'm talking about the paragraph starting "The use of data-collection technologies". Here's the thing: it doesn't support an article about Vernier. In other words, it certainly helps sell Vernier products, but it doesn't inform the reader about who Vernier is. It might belong on a general article about [[Data collection in student laboratories]] or something similar.

So I'm not talking about the rest of the article being an advert, just that specific paragraph/justification of Vernier technology. Thanks, tedder (talk) 04:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my misunderstanding. I believed you were referencing the "Current Products" section, and was unclear of your reasons for that. My thinking about the data collections paragraph was an attempt to show the worthiness of the page's existence with statistical backing for why the company's products are important tools for education, much the same as a language program would reference the increased language retention of its users. I agree that this may be better suited for another, more general page, but as none exists at this moment I would like to find some way to include it.--Niehusa (talk) 05:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree that it's useful information. I can't figure out how to include it- do you have any ideas? tedder (talk) 05:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure that I can think of something. I am thinking of linking it to the info about President Obama, as one of the topics he was reported to have discussed during his visit was centered around this idea. --Niehusa (talk) 06:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Vernier Software & Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vernier Software & Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100627004041/http://www.oregon100best.com:80/ to http://www.oregon100best.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]