This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Please be careful when reverting the frequent vandalism to this page. I just fixed old vandalism by 174.0.234.248: the section header "People" was changed to the name of a non-noteworthy Veronica. Nurg's correction was to simply blank the name. Always check the history to see exactly what has changed, please; the main clue that the correction was in error was that a whole slew of real people beginning with Saint Veronica were suddenly listed under "Fiction".98.211.124.111 (talk) 14:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The page was full of errors that reflect ignorance or contempt toward WP:Dab. I could bear neither to leave it untouched nor to wring every last fault out of it, so don't imagine i have made it perfect. --Jerzy•t23:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
More specifically, i made no judgment about whether there is a WP:Primary topic, but the misuse of the primary-topic layout with an equal-Dabn Dab title creates sufficient presumption that nothing more editor's unexamined gut preference was involved, in the implicit decision about the accompanying article. I'll revert from primary to equal unless sufficient evidence of there being a primary topic appears on this talk page. --Jerzy•t00:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
