Talk:Vestibule (architecture)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Vestibule (architecture) was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
February 9, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed
WikiProject Architecture (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Comment[edit]

Some feedback, and a few more editors working on this article would be nice. Volunteers appreciated. -Selket Talk 20:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination[edit]

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 9, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The article appears well written, with proper English and providing wikilinks to outside terms related to the topic.
2. Factually accurate?: For the most part it looks accurate, with a couple of inline citations. I would recommend adding more sources more inline citations for your information as a good start for Good Article. Three is not enough.
3. Broad in coverage?: This is the main reason I am not passing the article. It may be difficult to find information, but I'm sure there are several architecture books out there that cover vestibules. Perhaps you can elaborate on their current usage, if it adds to the value of homes/the cost of the room, benefits, vestibules in other countries, etc. Look to other architecture articles and get examples from there or consider getting a peer review of people more knowledgeable in architecture who may be able to help you.
4. Neutral point of view?: The article appears NPOV, keep it that way.
5. Article stability? Appears stable, I don't foresee any problems with that in the future.
6. Images?: Good use of images, I would keep all of them. If possible attempt to get an image of a current day vestibule or any historic paintings/drawings of the Roman/Greek vestibules.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far.

This has a good start to it, but it needs to go broader in coverage with more sources. It just needs some more sources and possibly more help for ideas to improve it. Improve on the above issues before nominating again. --Nehrams2020 22:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)