Talk:Vilofoss
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes. |
I have resourced the article! Let me know if it is enough and please don't delete it since the Vilofoss brand name is quite significant in the international market for feedstuff industry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ite10 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- The sources you added are provided by the company itself, you need to find third-party sources sources. News, books, anything about the company that is not directly linked to it. Victão Lopes Fala! 15:56, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
I have deleted the references directly linked to the company. I will try to find third party now. Please , don't delete the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ite10 (talk • contribs) 07:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Now, I have added third party sources. i really hope that the deletion will be canceled — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ite10 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for trying to improve the article. However I'm afraid the references you have added do not seem to me to be enough to establish the notability of the topic. The first appears to be essentially a press release from the company; the second and third are videos of a representative of the company making an announcement about it; and the fourth doesn't even seem to mention the name, except in a list of logos on the right-hand side whose purpose is unclear. As the deletion template says: You may remove this message [i.e. the text between pairs of braces beginning Proposed deletion/dated] if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason; if you do so then the article is likely to be taken to the articles for deletion process, where its status can be discussed by the wider community. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 12:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)@
Well, i have added some more third party citations, so I hope now the notability rules are met — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ite10 (talk • contribs) 11:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)