Talk:Vincent Vega

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-01-23. The result of the discussion was Merge to List of Pulp Fiction characters.

the formatting is screwed on the page; vic vega redirects back to vincent vega, and naked code is visible: "Reservoir Dogs + #redirect Pulp Fiction". Im no wikipedian genius so ill just hope someone who knows how to fix this will see this. YAY. --71.107.69.226 04:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

I fixed the problem. There is no more naked code visible.--SacredVisions 18:36, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This should be merged and redirected back to Pulp Fiction. Awards belong in either the article about John Travolta or the film proper, and the remainder (what can be reliably referenced) belongs in the latter. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Argument with Jules

I wouldn't call it an argument. It's not like they were at each other's throats. Would "discussion" suffice?EmpComm 22:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pulp fiction,0.jpg

Image:Pulp fiction,0.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wrong

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72wOZjmVAmk he is not dead.

You ARE aware the events of the movie are not depicted in chronological order, right? They leave the diner, and then later he is sent to find Butch, where he's shot because Jules, having quit the job, isn't with him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.188.60 (talk) 19:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TV

Does he really "repeatedly" reference TV shows? The only TV reference I can think of is Cops. Emile 19:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MAC-10 or MAC-11

On this page Vincent's gun is described as a MAC-11, on the Pulp Fiction page it's a MAC-10. Can someone with a lot of gun knowledge resolve this one way or another? The public needs to know just which gun it was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blahaccountblah (talk • contribs) 16:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup during AfD

I've done a thorough cleanup and rewrite, some factoring, added detail, merged the trivia and added a tag requesting more cites. Now I think it needs lots of cited commentary. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]